The Spinster and the Prophet: Florence Deeks, H.G.Wells, and the Mystery of the Purloined Past
by A.B. McKillop, Professor of History, Carleton University. Published with Macfarlane, Walter & Ross, 2000.
One of Canada’s pre-eminent historians, A.B. McKillop has restored to life a unique tale of heroism and intrigue, obsession and betrayal. The novelist and social prophet H.G. Wells had a way with words, and usually had his way with women. That is, until the philandering author encountered the feisty Toronto spinster, Florence Deeks. In a half-million-dollar legal action launched in 1925, she claimed that in an act of “literary piracy” Wells had somehow come to use her unpublished history of the world in the writing of his best-selling book, The Outline of History. Thus began one of the most extraordinary cases in Anglo-American legal history. The Spinster and the Prophet is a rivetting literary detective story, and as Professor A.B. McKillop unravels this legal mystery he reveals that the verdict of the courts may not be that of history. The cast of characters he invokes is as intriguing as it is wide, in Canada, the United States, and England – eminent lawyers and judges, renowned publishers and editors, prominent professors, members of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and ordinary office secretaries. Above all, the story involved the very different lives of Mr. Wells, his wife and his mistresses, and of Miss Florence Deeks, her family, and her search for justice.In carrying out this work, A.B. McKillop places legal history in the finest tradition of historical narrative. By adopting the method of telling in tandem the intertwined stories of Florence Deeks and H.G.Wells he develops those stories in the context of several exciting themes which illustrate how the values and prejudices of the day moved forcefully and decisively into the courtrooms of Canada and the British Empire. Most important, perhaps, is what Deeks v. Wells reveals of the respective places in contemporary society of men and women. In doing so Professor McKillop gives Florence Deeks a voice which was denied to her by the patriarchal society of her day. In this sense, many readers may conclude that, however belatedly, a measure of justice finally has been done for the courageous Toronto spinster Florence Deeks.
Related Topics
Contents
Contents
Foreword xi
Preface xiii
I Lace Curtains 1
2 Formations 9
3 Labour and Constancy 30
4 The Great Reserve 50
5 Loves and Wars 74
6 History and Humanity 99
7 Shadows 115
8 Outlines 136
9 Devils in Details 158
10 Accusations 184
11 Investigations 210
12 Delays and Discoveries 231
13 Enter King David, and So On 258
14 Ripostes 295
15 Justice 340
16 Lancaster Gate 362
17 Voices 378
Sources 409
Notes 415
Acknowledgments 453
Credits and Permissions 458
Index 460
Awards
- Finalist for the Governor General's Literary Award for Nonfiction (2000)
- Winner of the City of Toronto Book Award (2001)
- Winner of the Arthur Ellis Award for Best Non-Fiction (2001)
- Finalist for the Charles Taylor Award for Literary Non-Fiction. (2002)
- Winner of the UBC Medal for Canadian Biography (2001)
- Finalist for the Drainie-Taylor Prize for Biography (2001)
Reviews
[A.B. McKillop] grants Deeks, belittled by Wells' supporters as a 'light-minded', and angry 'spinster', a manner of historical justice that the law and the press were unwilling and unable to give at the time of her trial. Daniel Nasaw, New York Times Book Review, January 5, 2003
This rigorous and compassionate book is a valuable contribution... Michelene Wandor, Guardian Weekly, March 8 - 14, 2001
Combining the rigour of a professional historian with the pacing of a thriller writer...he tells ...a fascinating story and in doing so casts new light on Wells, while also giving a little bit of the history of Canadian publishing and revealing many ironies. The Economist, February 3, 2001
Riveting stuff. McKillop is always in control, providing careful commentary, but mostly letting the trial simply unfold for the reader, who becomes a kind of jury. Aida Edamariam, National Post Online, September 25, 2000
Peter Schneider, University Affairs, May 2001, pp. 23-24
The National Post, December 9, 2000
John Givner, “Challenging the Empire”, The Toronto Star, October 8, 2000
Kildare Dobbs, “H.G. Wells a plagiarist? Case not proven”, The Globe and Mail, September 30, 2000